Sunday, October 19, 2014

Congrats, Sam Hilliard and The Last Track - #1 on Amazon Kindle Bestseller List!

Over 36,000 downloaded TODAY!

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

The Process of Writing

by Selaine Henriksen

When we speak of the writing process, often what is being referred to is the habit of sitting down every day and writing. It can also refer to actively learning the craft, reading what others have to say, and reading, reading, reading. I have an ecelctic taste in reading (hence the blog title and I often bounce from one genre to another, as well as to non-fiction and of course, down the rabbit hole of the internet.

One rule I always tried to keep when reading other's work, was to finish one book before I began another. I don't any more. I have less time than I used to, and if a book hasn't grabbed me (I'll give it a chapter or two) I'm done with it. Maybe I'll pick it up again at another time. Books can resonate with where you are in your life and maybe this one will affect me later.

In a similar fashion I find the creative process different from the writing process. A story I'm working on may come to a screeching halt, mainly due to the fact that I haven't solved a plot problem. I'll sit and try and force it. Literally mashing the key board, hoping something will come out that I can shape into a plot. What usually happens instead—at least for me—is that a completely new character, and their story, waltz into my head. I used to fight it—no, I must finish one story before I move on to another—but now I go with it. Start the next one. And, when that one comes to a grinding halt, as they are want to do, I go back to the first one, and seeing it with fresh eyes, the answer to whatever problem there was, suddenly appears. This way I always have something to work on and, as my stories are as ecclectic as my reading, and are very different in tone and style. When I return to something it feels fresh, instead of forced.

If I have any advice to pass on then, it's never throw anything out. You may not get back to a story until months, years even, have passed but when you do you'll see the problems with fresh eyes, with new knowledge, and experience. A story you thought was hopeless may turn out in the end to be your favorite.

© 2014 Selaine Henriksen

SELAINE HENRIKSEN has supported her writing habit by working a variety of jobs over the years, from bookstore clerk to research technologist. Currently a fitness instructor and mom to two editors-in-training, she lives in Ottawa, Ontario, where she is a member of Capital Crime Writers. She has eclectic reading tastes, as well as writing, but is a firm believer that at the heart of every good story is a mystery. Selaine's work, "My Grandmother's Attic," appeared in Buddhapuss Ink's Mystery Times Ten 2013. She blogs at

Thanks, Selaine! We're always telling authors: "Think twice before deleting a piece, or even a passage, you never know when you'll find the perfect spot for it!" Sadly, once tossed it is often impossible to recreate.
We hope everyone has enjoyed today's edition of #WW Writer Wednesday, and we encourage you to follow our blog so you never miss a single issue! Hats off to all our writers who so graciously share their thoughts, words, and experiences here. Up next week, veteran writer, KC Sprayberry who talks about "Tweeting Do's and Don'ts." See you then!   ~ The Black Cat


Wednesday, October 8, 2014

Critiquing Without Scars

Let me tell you a secret. You know how getting feedback on your writing can feel like you’re lying on a plastic surgeon’s table while a masked doctor cuts you open without anesthesia while giving you a running commentary about your flaws? The secret is that giving feedback can also be hard for the person doling it out, and finding the perfect balance of honest and gentle can be tough. In other words, you don’t want to be the reason someone gives up on their dreams. The good news is that whichever side of the knife you’re on, it’s possible to minimize post-critique scarring.

  First let’s talk about making the procedure easier for the surgeon, which means that when you’re seeking feedback, you have some decisions to make. You’ll feel more receptive to feedback if you’re comfortable, so consider your own psychology and preferences. You’re not going to go for a massage at a construction site or seek psychotherapy in a haunted house, right? I prefer face-to-face over internet feedback because it better allows for discussion—not argument—and clarification, but interacting with beta readers or an online critique group over email or chat from the comfort of your own home can work too.

  Here are some things to consider to make the process easier for you and your critique partners or beta readers regardless of where and how you communicate:

  •  “Tell me what you think” isn’t a very useful request. Be specific as to what kind of feedback you’re looking for. 
  • If you’re just starting out, it might be character development and whether the plot works. If you’re more advanced, you may ask for more nuanced feedback like places where the reader gets pulled out of the story and why.  
  •  Don’t ask the same readers to read the same work over and over. I was in one critique group where certain members would send the same manuscript through multiple times simply because they hadn’t written anything else. Doubly annoying was that they wouldn’t listen to or incorporate feedback from the earlier drafts. The exception is if you’ve done a significant rewrite and completely reworked the story. 
  •  After you receive feedback, whether it’s good, bad, or mixedand if your critique partner is doing his/her job, it will be mixedreward yourself. You’ve done something brave, and you deserve a treat for putting your writing out there for criticism. 
  •  Beta read and critique for others as well, especially if they’ve put in the time and effort to look at your work.

What if you’re the one wielding the knife? Here are some tips to help your critique target better take your feedback and not run screaming or stop writing:

  • Start with something positive. The writer is likely cringing in their chair ready for a blow. Beginning with something you liked gives them hope and encouragement. 
  • Include a balance of things you liked and disliked. Find something that works. Anything. Even if it’s the font. Okay, maybe not the font. Keep your serifs to yourself. 
  • Be aware of and honest about your own strengths and weaknesses. Some people are great on a detail level and catch inconsistencies or wrong words that Spellcheck didn’t. Others are better at the macro level with story and character arcs. 
  • Don’t be harsh. Sometimes people take a request for honest feedback to mean that the writer wants to be crushed in the worst, most humiliating way possible. “Oh, it’s just getting you ready for bad reviews” isn’t a helpful attitude for someone at a sensitive developmental stage of writing, and all the stages of one’s writing career feel sensitive at some point. 
  • Don’t start with, “I really wanted to like this, but…” It means you didn’t like the story and the writer disappointed you on a personal level – a double failure. 
  • Don’t include personal anecdotes in critiques.  
  • Be aware how your own biases regarding genre may affect your ability to give useful feedback. If you hate horror novels, don’t agree to critique one. Similarly, if you have a visceral negative response to something, make sure you’re not reacting to something in your own history or life rather than the story. 
  • After doing a critique, reward yourself for doing something nice for someone else.

I’ve been lucky that my critique group and beta reader experiences have been mostly positive, but many of these suggestions come from experience. If you have any to add, I’d love to read them in the comments!

©2014 Cecilia Dominic

The Black Cat thanks today's guest writer: Cecilia Dominic

Cecilia Dominic wrote her first story when she was two years old and has always had a much more interesting life inside her head than outside of it. She became a clinical psychologist because she's fascinated by people and their stories, but she couldn't stop writing fiction. By day, she helps people cure their insomnia without using medication. By night, she blogs about wine and writes fiction she hopes will keep her readers turning the pages all night. Yes, she recognizes the conflict of interest between her two careers, so she writes under a pen name. She lives in Atlanta, Georgia with one husband and two cats, which, she's been told, is a good number of each. Cecilia’s story The Golden Temple won first place in the 2011 Mystery Times Ten competition, and her first novel The Mountain’s Shadow has just been released in paperback.

You can find Cecilia at:

Twitter: @RandomOenophile

We hope you enjoyed this week's issue of #WW Writer Wednesday! Follow us so you don't miss a single edition of this fun and informative series! Be sure and come back next week when #WW Writer Selaine Henriksen posts a piece on the Writing Process!